4 thoughts on “Zhou Dafu's price was wrong, and the couple spent 40,000 to buy 250,000 gold decoration. Who should pay for the mistakes of the merchant?”
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Merchant mistakes should be paid by the merchant themselves, and consumers should not pay, but the court finally ruled that the purchase contract of the two parties was invalid.
The topic "Chow Tai Fook" at the top of the hot search list has aroused the attention of many netizens. This incident was because Zhou Dafu had a mistake in bidding, and a couple bought a gold jewelry worth 250,000 yuan. It is determined that the couple should return the remaining 200,000 jewelry. Who should pay for this error of the merchant? Xiaobian tells you.
Why should the seller's error be borne by the buyer? This incident was a couple purchased 12 gold ornaments under the online store owned by Chow Tai Fook, but the price of these gold jewelry was 210,000 yuan from the general sales price in the store. Contact, notifying its price is the labeling of an error request to cancel the order. As the condition proposed by the merchant, Zhou Dafu returned these gold jewelry and would pay 500 yuan to each of them afterwards. But from the perspective of consumers, I have purchased this product, and the price is also marked by the merchant. Why should I be responsible for the merchant, so I chose to refuse to refund.
For this situation, Chow Tai Fook also decisively chose to sue the couple. In the end, the court found that Zhou Dafu was not a false publicity. And this couple did not provide evidence to prove that Zhou Dafu had a low -cost promotional behavior. Afterwards, it was determined that the couple should be paid to Chow Tai Fook Company and canceled all their orders at the beginning. In fact, such incidents happened before before. After, Zhou Dafu was exposed on the online platform to expose the information of wool. Many netizens found this bug. Some netizens said that this is Zhou Dafu's flagship store to reduce prices in gold. It only costs 7,000 yuan.
Although Zhou Dafu recovered his 200,000 again, many netizens said that Zhou Dafu's behavior disappointed many consumers. It is unacceptable.
Merchant errors are paid by consumers, and such sales contracts can be lifted according to the court's decision.
According to the local people's court's judgment contract, the parties should follow some fair principles. If the parties of one party are based on the contract set by a major office, it can be actively revoked